After a year of owning the S5, I finally decided to bite the bullet and purchase the Material Station. These are my impressions as someone who paid their own money for one and who’s actually used it non-stop for a couple of months, along with some of the things I’ve learned that surprised me due to none of the marketing material or paid reviews having covered them.
The Ultimaker Material Station is an expensive add-on (sort of — more on that in a minute) to the Ultimaker S5 3D printer that solves all of these complaints and more.
When I was deciding if I would fork over the hefty sum of cash for this unit, I was surprised by the lack of useful information out there. I posted a question on Reddit about it and after mulling over what I read there I decided to buy it. Having used the hell out of it for just over two months, I decided to write up what I’ve learned.
Let me say up front that I freaking love this thing. It’s made just about every aspect of printing with the S5 easier, and compared with needing to spin the printer around to change spools, it is an absolute joy to use. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, though, so let me first talk about the good and then I’ll cover the not-so-good.
Let’s cover some of my favorite good points about the Material Station.
It’s not Really an Add-On
The reason I say that the Material Station isn’t an add-on is because it seems plain to me that the S5 was designed from the ground up to use it. By comparison, the default means of hanging two spools off of a hub on the back seems downright archaic by comparison. Before the Material Station I had problems with spools unraveling, and dealing with the manual insertion of the filament into the feeders had been problematic on more than one occasion. All of those problems just go away with the Material Station.
My guess is that someone designed the entire system and then was told (or was smart enough) to separate it out into parts so that the price of entry could be lower.
Changing filament is a joy
In this example I have slot F loaded with PVA and routed to print core (2), but slot B has generic PLA that’s also going to Print Core (2). They don’t both use the installed AA 0.4 print core, so if you choose to print with PVA the printer will prompt you to change Print Core (2) to a BB, though you’ll have had to override the existing settings in Cura to get there since Cura reflects what’s in the printer.
Oh – and perhaps the best part of all of this is that you can add, remove, or change any spool that isn’t being currently used while the printer is printing! Doing a long print and the filament in use is running low? Simply add another spool of that material into another slot for the same Print Core and the printer will automatically fail over to it when the first spool is empty.
Climate Control is a Joy
The Material Station works to keep the humidity inside itself to below 40%. It does this by having a chamber filled with silica beads, and when it senses the humidity getting too high it heats them to regenerate them. Note that this won’t dry out PVA that’s already absorbed humidity, but you can always set the build plate to 50°C and let the spool sit in its box on the build plate for a few hours as per Ultimaker’s own recommendations. I think the two hours mentioned there is not long enough, but the S5 does have an enclosed build volume with the Air Manager attached, so maybe it is.
The Build Quality is Fantastic
The S5 Works Better with the Material Station
When I first got the S5 I had all sorts of problems with the run-out sensors triggering false positives so I ended up turning them off. With the Material Station, I turned them back on and after over 300 hours of printing have not had a single false positive. I believe this is due to the fact that the Material Station has multiple sensors in it so the entire system has a better understanding of the filament at every stage of its travels. In fact, when I had PVA break in the bowden tube (more on that in a bit) the additional sensors actually allowed the machine to tell me where the problem was. It’s not always 100% accurate, but it’s a super useful addition.
Cura Show Every Permutation of Available Print Options
- A: Ultimaker Black Tough PLA (1)
- B: Ultimaker Black Tough PLA (1)
- C: Ultimaker Red PLA (2)
- D: Ultimaker Orange PLA (1)
- E: Generic Yellow PLA (2)
- F: Ultimaker PVA (2)
Cura then took every possible permutation and listed them as pairs that could be chosen, which I found to be very user friendly. There are more combinations available via the scrollbar on the side.
While I do love the Material Station, here are some of my thoughts on things I’m not too fond of in regards to the Material Station.
It’s Ridiculously Expensive
Is it worth the price? If you consider the S5 to be worth the $6000 price, then yeah, I’d say the Material Station is worth $3,300. Whether you consider those prices to be valid or an “Ultimaker Tax” is up to you, but having owned a pretty expensive BCN3D SigMax that I considered to be junk, I do think this printer is better. It’s also not cheap import junk, so don’t compare it with anything made by the likes of Creality and expect it to have a similar price. Yes, I know a machine like this can’t escape Chinese components, but there’s this is not a $300 machine with a $10k price tag.
It Wastes a lot of Filament
Because of the nature of 3D printing and the desired autonomy and automation of the S5, the addition of the Material Station causes a lot of filament waste. Here are the two biggest offenders that I’ve noticed.
1) Purging Before and After Every Use
According to this article from Ultimaker, the S5 with the Material Station will prime and deprime at the start and end of each print as well as when an end of a spool condition is detected. The result of these primes and deprimes is a pile of ugly filament strings in the bottom of the printer, the likes of which I’d never seen when swapping spools manually.
The engineering part of my brain accepts this as likely the result of many experiments that resulted in procedures used to guarantee the highest rate of print and function success. I’d imagine that the alternative would be a great deal of manual control which is counter to the reason for getting the Material Station in the first place.
The bottom line is that this is just part of having a Material Station, so understand that you’ll need to clean out the bottom of the printer more often than you’re used to if you’ve been printing with a bare-bones S5.
2) Empty Spools are not Truly Empty
Now, it’s really cool that the empty spool was detected and then replaced by the spool of Ultimaker Tough-PLA in position B, but that’s not an inconsequential amount of filament left on that roll. How much is on there? About six feet (1.8m). According to the data sheet, a spool of Tough-PLA in black has 96m of filament, so rounding up to 2m for easy math, we get 1/48th which means almost 2% of it was left on the roll. That’s… not great.
It Slows Down Prints
How much time does it add? I printed this small nut I designed which, as you can see in the Cura screenshot, should take six minutes. Inclusive of prime, bed-leveling, startup, printing, deprime, and (I assume) cool-down, the print took 16 minutes. Prints using both extruders take even more time since each side must be primed and deprimed.
Broken PVA can be the the Stuff of Nightmares
This page from Ultimaker makes it seem like an almost trivial task to get a piece of broken PVA out from the machine, but that guide only applies to PVA broken outside the Material Station. It doesn’t really tell the whole story because sometimes PVA can break and get stuck inside the mergers (the black curved pieces in the photo) within the Material Station, and when that happens you may have to remove the Material Station from the printer, flip it over, take the bottom off, and disassemble the unit to resolve the issue. This page from the Ultimaker Community (an awesome resource) shows one user’s process of getting a piece of broken PVA out from within the bowels of the Material Station. The image of the Material Station guts in this section is from the official Ultimaker Material Station Repair Guide, and let me tell you: it’s not a simple user-friendly process.
I have no problem building, disassembling, and otherwise tinkering or troubleshooting even the most complex of systems, but all of that is on the bottom of the Material Station which sits on the bottom of the S5. It’s a pain in the ass just to get to it!
What’s the moral of the story? Keep your PVA dry, and if it’s not dry, then dry it out before you put it in the Material Station! Every person I’ve talked to who’s had to do this said that their PVA had been exposed to too much moisture when it happened.
The System is Clearly Designed for Ultimaker Spools
You can use Generic Spools! But use is Limited
You cannot have different colors of the same generic material and have the printer understand that. For example if you load two rolls of MatterHackers PLA-Pro: one purple and one red, the printer only knows them each as “Generic PLA”. That has some important drawbacks including:
If they’re both set to the same Print Core, and purple runs out then it will continue with red and vice-versa. Additionally, the printer, and thus Cura, will only see each spool as the material you’ve selected and will have no concept of what color each spool is, so you’ll need to just keep that straight yourself. If you have multiple of the same generic material loaded into a Print Core, the printer will choose the one you loaded first regardless of color.
You can print two-color objects using generic filaments with the Material Station, but to do so the simplest way is to load *only* those two generic colors, and have each of those colors loaded into the proper Print Core. If the rest of the loaded spools are Ultimaker then the printer will handle this perfectly since they are not “generic”.
Note that in my example this will cause the printer to use the grey spool of the orange runs out, so I would think that a better solution would be to set up custom selections in Cura – especially if your filament has different print properties than the Ultimaker materials. Thanks for the tip, Theo!
Not All Generic Filaments are Supported
One of the things I’ve wanted to do was print with some Carbon Fiber filament, so I dutifully dropped an additional $3oo on a 0.60mm CC Print Core and went shopping for some Carbon Fiber. The one that seemed to check all the boxes for me was BASF Ultrafuse PAHT CF15. There’s even a plugin for it in the Ultimaker Marketplace! Nice!
There’s no Elegant way to Bypass the Material Station
It would be really useful to have a bypass setting where I could have an external roll (say, of BASF Ultrafuse PAHT CF15) that I could print with while totally bypassing the Material Station. Hell, Ultimaker could make even more money by selling me an external dry-box with an Ultimaker robot on it. I’m in this deep, so why not?
My point is that with the recommendation to not use the Material Station in the last section, but with no way to disable or bypass the Material Station short of turning it off, it seems like there should be a more elegant solution for using standalone external rolls of filament.
The Perhaps Not-So-Obvious
I imagine such a thing is possible, but due to the need to prime and purge every color every change, not to mention the additional wear on the entire system since the spools are so far away from the hot-ends, I imagine this is not something Ultimaker considers a necessity on what is designed to be a automated industrial-scale machine.
I wish it allowed for configuration of color when using generic spools so that it could be as useful as it is with Ultimaker spools, and I wish it was less expensive, but even with those caveats I don’t consider the negatives I listed to be deal-breakers, so I still recommend it. You know, if you can afford it.
Donate: PayPal Crypto:
5 thoughts on “Ultimaker S5 Material Station Review”
Regarding the problem with multiple colors of third party materials, can’t you just lie to the material station that you’ve inserted an Ultimaker material in the color of your choice? The plain S5 has the option (scrolling all the way down to “Select other material” then choose an Ultimaker one).
Whoa – nice! I never scrolled all the way to the bottom and didn’t know this was a thing! I’ll update the section and give you credit.
Really great review on this unique product. I’ve been considering getting this add-on, but because of cost and not knowing how well it works I hesitated. I’m now considering again to get the unit. Thanks.
As someone who has owned a S5 Bundle for about 18 months, I have mixed feelings about the Material Station. Yes it’s extremely convenient and when it works it’s wonderful, but is it worth $3,300… no way. First major problem is it dries out the filament TOO MUCH, especially soluble materials like PVA. I’ve placed a permanent sensor inside the cabinet and the humidity goes well below 20% at time (your mileage may vary). So now if I’m not printing everyday I remove the PVA inside the MS to keep it more pliable. So consider the MS as nothing more then a “dehydrator” with no timer or sophisticated controls.
I don’t know how many times I’ve had to dismantle the MS to unclog broken pieces of PVA… granted I’m good at it now, but spending hours futzing with it is a PIA. The cabinet design forces you to turn it on it’s head to remove the bottom plate, which is nothing more then cheap plastic. So you first need to remove both the S5 and Air Station. Then you’ll need remove ALL the spools just to turn it over, then remove the flimsy bottom panel to gain access to the diverter system. No forethought what so ever in giving the end user access to the complicated workings inside. The exit Bowen Tubes from the “diverter” have very tight radii so dried filaments can and will crack easily and often. Also some of my RFID sensors don’t register any of the Ultimaker spools, let alone 3rd party materials and all of them suffer from showing the bay empty when there’s plenty of Filament left on the spools.
I’ve been very patient waiting for the folks at Ultimaker to fix some of these issues, but every firmware update seems to make matters worse. One of their big fixes is to recoil all the filaments back into the MS after a 60 minute delay when the print finishes. But this made it worse… since it the over drying is the reason for all the breakage.
Bottom line is that the Ultimaker MS makes the S5, a great printer on it’s own, a little better most times, but when it gets it nose out of joint you’ll pay dearly for it in time and frustration.
Great points, and I agree. FWIW I’ve totally given up on Ultimaker PVA. Since moving to Matterhackers Pro PVA I’ve had no problems with the PVA breaking. The Ultimaker stuff is just too damn brittle out of the box and as you say – the dehydration just makes it worse.